Innovation and risk in an innovative learning environment: A Private Public Partnership in Australia

Cortez Deacetis

Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2011) National report on schooling in Australia 2011. ACARA, Sydney, 2013. Available at: https://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/National_Report_on_Schooling_in_Australia_2011.pdf (accessed 2 July 2021).
Google Scholar

Australian National Audit Office (2010) Building the education revolution – primary schools for the 21st century. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Google Scholar

Bazeley, P (2013) Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: SAGE.
Google Scholar

Benade, L (2019) Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 54(1): 5368.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Benade, L, Jackson, M (2017) Introduction to ACCESS special issue: Modern learning environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(8): 744748.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Blackmore, J, Bateman, D, Loughlin, J, O’Mara, J, Aranda, G (2011) Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: Melbourne Education Policy and Research Division.
Google Scholar

Brogaard, L (2017) The impact of innovation training on successful outcomes in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review 19(8):11841205.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Brown, LM, Gilligan, C (1991) Listening for voice in narratives of relationship. New Directions for Child Development 54: 4362.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Byers, T, Mahat, K, Liu, A, Knock, K, et al. (2018) A systematic review of the effects of learning environments on student learning outcomes. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, LEaRN. Available at: https://www.iletc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/TR4_Web.pdf (accessed 2 July 2021).
Google Scholar

Cardellino, P, Woolner, P (2020) Designing for transformation – a case study of open learning spaces and educational change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 28(3): 383402.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Carvalho, L, Nicholson, T, Yeoman, P, et al. (2020) Space matters: Framing the New Zealand learning landscape. Learning Environments Research 23: 307329.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Chapman, A, Randell-Moon, H, Campbell, M, et al. (2014) Students in space: Student practices in non-traditional classrooms. Global Studies of Childhood 4(1): 3948.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Cleveland, B (2016) A school but not as we know it! Towards schools for networked communities. In: Annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), Melbourne, Australia, 27 November1 December. Available at: https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/scholarlywork/1221889-a-school-but-not-as-we-know-it!-towards-schools-for-networked-communities (accessed 2 July 2021).
Google Scholar

Cleveland, B (2018) Innovative learning environments as complex adaptive systems: Enabling middle years’ education. In: Benade, L, Jackson, M (eds) Transforming Education: Design & Governance in Global Contexts. Singapore: Springer, pp.5578.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Council of the European Union (2018) Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union C189: 113.
Google Scholar

Daniels, H, Tse, HM, Stables, A, et al. (2017) Design as a social practice: The design of new build schools. Oxford Review of Education 43(6): 767787.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Daniels, H, Tse, HM, Stables, A, et al. (2019) Design as a social practice: The experience of new build schools. Cambridge Journal of Education 49(2): 215233.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Deed, C, Lesko, T (2015) Unwalling the classroom: Teacher reaction and adaptation. Learning Environment Research 18: 217231.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Department for Education and Schools (2003) Building schools for the future: Consultation on a new approach to capital investment. London: DfES.
Google Scholar

Deppeler, J, Aikens, K (2020) Responsible innovation in school design – a systematic review. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2(3): 575597.
Google Scholar

Education and Skills Funding Agency (2011) Priority school building programme (PSBP). Government of the United Kingdom (Gov UK). Available at: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Priority_School_Building_Programme_PSBP (accessed 2 July 2021).
Google Scholar

Fereday, J, Muir-Cochrane, E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1): 8092.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Flemig, S, Osborne, S, Kinder, T (2016) Risky business – reconceptualizing risk and innovation in public services. Public Money & Management 36(6): 425432.
Google Scholar | Crossref

French, R, Imms, W, Mahat, M (2019) Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to Innovative Learning Environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools 23(2): 175189.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Fullan, M (2016) The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change 17(4): 539544.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Gilligan, C, Spencer, R, Weinberg, MK, et al. (2003) On the listening guide: A voice-centred relational method. In: Rhodes, JE, Yardley, L, Camic, PM (eds) Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp.157172.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Gislason, N (2010) Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research 13(2): 127145.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Gislason, N (2015) The open plan high school: educational motivations and challenges. In: Woolner, P (ed.) School Design Together. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.101119.
Google Scholar

Heers, M, Van Klaveren, C, Groot, W, et al. (2016) Community schools: What we know and what we need to know. Review of Educational Research 86(4): 10161051.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Hitt, HD, Tucker, PD (2016) Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research 86(2): 531569.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Hodge, G, Greve, C, Biygautane, M (2018) Do PPP’s work? What and how have we been learning so far? Public Management Review, 20(8): 11051121.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Hong, S, Kim, TK (2018) Public–private partnership meets corporate social responsibility – the case of H-JUMP school. Public Money & Management 38(4): 297304.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Kariippanon, KE, Cliff, DP, Lancaster, SL, et al. (2018) Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research 21: 301320.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Kariippanon, KE, Cliff, DP, Lancaster, SL, et al. (2019a) Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0223607.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

Kariippanon, KE, Cliff, DP, Okely, AD, et al. (2019b) The ‘why’ and ‘how’ of flexible learning spaces: A complex adaptive systems analysis. Journal of Educational Change. Epub ahead of print 15 November 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10833-019-09364-0.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Kokko, AK, Hirsto, L (2021) From physical spaces to learning environments: Processes in which physical spaces are transformed into learning environments. Learning Environments Research 24(1): 71–85.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Könings, KD, Bovill, C, Woolner, P (2017) Towards an interdisciplinary model of practice for participatory building design in education. European Journal of Education 52(3): 306317.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Leiringer, R, Cardellino, P (2011) Schools for the twenty-first century: School design and educational transformation. British Educational Research Journal 37(6): 915934.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Lubberink, R, Blok, V, Van Ophem, J, Omta, O (2019) Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: An exploratory study of values integration in innovations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6(2): 179210.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Macaulay, L (2020) Australian Sudanese and South Sudanese youths’ perspectives on the youth/parent relationship and its influence on the transition to adulthood. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research 29(2): 137156.
Google Scholar

Macaulay, L, Deppeler, J (2020) Perspectives on negative media representations of Sudanese and South Sudanese youths in Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies 41(2): 213230.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Mäkelä, T, Helfenstein, S, Lerkkanen, M, et al. (2018) Student participation in learning environment improvement: Analysis of a co-design project in a Finnish upper secondary school. Learning Environments Research 21: 1941.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Mulcahy, D (2016) Policy matters: De/Re/territorialising spaces of learning in victorian government schools. Journal of Education Policy 31(1): 8197.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Mulcahy, D, Morrison, C (2017) Re/assembling ‘innovative’ learning environments: Affective practice and its politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(8): 749758.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Mulcahy, D, Cleveland, B, Aberton, H (2015) Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, Enacted and Experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23(4): 575595.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Niemi, K (2020) ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland, Education Inquiry. Epub ahead of print 9 September 2020. DOI: 10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013) Innovative learning environments, educational research and innovation. Report for the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing
Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015) Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. Report for the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017) The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. Report for the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Position paper for the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030{0841e0d75c8d746db04d650b1305ad3fcafc778b501ea82c6d7687ee4903b11a}20Position{0841e0d75c8d746db04d650b1305ad3fcafc778b501ea82c6d7687ee4903b11a}20Paper{0841e0d75c8d746db04d650b1305ad3fcafc778b501ea82c6d7687ee4903b11a}20{0841e0d75c8d746db04d650b1305ad3fcafc778b501ea82c6d7687ee4903b11a}2805.04.2018{0841e0d75c8d746db04d650b1305ad3fcafc778b501ea82c6d7687ee4903b11a}29.pdf (accessed 2 July 2021).
Google Scholar

Page, A, Davis, A (2016) The alignment of innovative learning environments and inclusive education: How effective is the new learning environment in meeting the needs of special education learners? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 13(2): 8198.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Pinz, A, Roudyani, N, Thaler, J (2018) Public–private partnerships as instruments to achieve sustainability-related objectives: The state of the art and a research agenda. Public Management Review 20(1): 122.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Reh, S, Rabenstein, K, Fritzsche, B (2011) Learning Spaces Without Boundaries? Territories, power and how Schools Regulate Learning. Social & Cultural Geography 12(1): 8398.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Ribeiro, B, Bengtsson, L, Benneworth, P, et al. (2018) Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 5(3): 316331.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Rybnicek, R, Plakolm, J, Baumgartner, B (2020) Risks in public–private partnerships: A systematic literature review of risk factors, their impact and risk mitigation strategies. Public Performance & Management Review. Epub ahead of print 10 April 2020. DOI:10.1080/15309576.2020.1741406.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Saltmarsh, S, Chapman, A, Campbell, M, et al. (2015) Putting ‘structure’ within the space: Spatially un/responsive pedagogic practices in open-plan learning environments. Educational Review 67(3): 315327.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Schabmann, A, Popper, V, Schmidt, BM, et al. (2016) The relevance of innovative school architecture for school principals. School Leadership & Management 36(2): 184203.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Schleicher, A (2018) World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Sigurðardóttir, AK (2018) Student-centred classroom environments in upper secondary school: Students’ ideas about good spaces for learning versus actual arrangements. In: Benade, L, Jackson, M (eds) Transforming Education: Design, Technology, Government. Singapore: Springer,pp.183197.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Sigurðardóttir, AK, Hjartarson, T (2016) The idea and reality of an innovative school: From inventive design to established practice in a new school building. Improving Schools 19(1): 6279.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Stilgoe, J, Owen, R, Macnaghten, P (2013) Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42: 15681580.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Tse, HM, Learoyd-Smith, S, Stables, A, et al. (2015) Continuity and conflict in school design: A case study from building schools for the future. Intelligent Buildings International 7(2–3): 6482.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Van Merriënboer, JJ, McKenney, S, Cullinan, D, Heuer, J (2017) Aligning pedagogy with physical learning spaces. European Journal of Education 52(3): 253267.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Veloso, L, Marques, JS (2017) Designing science laboratories: Learning environments, school architecture and teaching and learning models. Learning Environments Research 20(2): 221248.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Wang, H, Xiong, W, Wu, G, et al. (2018) Public–private partnership in public administration discipline: A literature review. Public Management Review 20(2): 293316.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Warsen, R, Nederhand, J, Klijn, EH, et al. (2018) What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs. Public Management Review 20(8): 11651185.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Wells, A, Jackson, M, Benade, L (2018) Modern learning environments: Embodiment of a disjunctive encounter. In Benade, L, Jackson, M (eds) Transforming education: Design and governance in global contexts. Singapore: Springer Nature: 317.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Wheeler, A, Malekzadeh, M (2015) Exploring the use of new school buildings through post-occupancy evaluation and participatory action research. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 11(6): 440456
Google Scholar | Crossref

Woolner, P, Thomas, U, Tiplady, LJ (2018) Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Journal of Educational Change 19: 223242.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Wright, N, Adam, A (2015) The ‘critical friend’ role in fostering reflective practices and developing staff cohesion: A case study in a new secondary school, New Zealand. School Leadership & Management 35(4): 441457.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Next Post

Supportive assessment strategies as curriculum events in a performance-oriented classroom context

Introduction This classroom case study revolves around the role and pedagogical implications of assessment strategies that are intended to support learning in a performance-oriented curricular assessment context. The article is based on the work undertaken in a larger research project on knowledge segregation in Swedish compulsory schools. In this project, […]

You May Like